esc?nebuLa
|
12.10.2008 21:38:50 | ||
Joined: 30. 10. 2005 Posts: 193 
|
[2337]w wrote:
I do agree with you here. I thought -Gips- was Viper as well. Everyone should just use their original alias/registered name for breakdown and not screw around with fakenicking :/ |
||
[2337]w
|
09.10.2008 14:03:24 | |
Joined: 26. 02. 2006 Posts: 487 
|
@goDz: There's still a difference: Last year everyone they all knew who tireBoss is (IP, playstyle, etc) and I wasn't renamed, but banned (I wasn't even offered a renaming!). This year no one (of the regular players) know who the faking team by Viper on #3 is, and they're neither renamed nor banned as far as I can see from now. About the "timescale reported" message. Sure it's (very often) a misleading message due to fps drops, vid_Restart, switching to window/fullscreen, etc.. But don't you agree that the overall cry for a wespban would have been much bigger than for dex if I had such a message?  |
|
P.J.RiPPeR
|
09.10.2008 10:45:14 | |
Joined: 31. 08. 2005 Posts: 437 
|
Fakers should be named in news with their real nicks if they want play with another team nicks. | |
|
goDz
|
08.10.2008 16:51:51 | |
Joined: 06. 08. 2006 Posts: 35
|
hey, first of all gg to all, some pretty nice demos. further: the timescale reported problem should be discussed way enough by now, i guess, no need to disqualify there. the, imo, bigger problem is the 'known faking' people. imo, if it is known, who is behind the fake, they either should be renamed or be kicked. w3sp refused to rename himself last year and got kicked because of that, thats okay. if people refuse to rename to real nicks, kick them - if not, rename them. everything else wouldnt be fair at last. w3sp: if you'd have timescale reported in your demo, i'd rather be extremely confused. you wouldn't have been kicked like all the others, the problem is known for very long and obviously not caused by cheating. gl&hf in the further competition from my side, and stop whining. goDz |
|
-nigativ-
|
08.10.2008 14:42:22 | |
|
Joined: 02. 06. 2008 Posts: 2 
|
dear wesp! Tbl cpaHbI 6oT.....yMouc9l TeJleHoK...Nice BOT - Rulezz. PBAHuHA! POCCu9l Bnepeg. Mo4u Ko3JloB! KaM6oy!!!!!   |
|
<nemesis>
|
06.10.2008 19:59:58 | |
Joined: 30. 08. 2005 Posts: 1240    
|
  |
|
eL-C7M
|
06.10.2008 19:48:34 | |
Joined: 22. 10. 2007 Posts: 19 
|
[with slower time] i mean. | |
|
stuff
|
06.10.2008 19:45:02 | |
|
Joined: 25. 09. 2008 Posts: 3 |
yes, i understand |
|
|
eL-C7M
|
06.10.2008 19:17:22 | |
|
Joined: 22. 10. 2007 Posts: 19
|
it is usually counted in df, if there are two exactly same times, someone with slower will have not next place, but on 1 lower place after next which it should be. Hope you uinderstand: D For example, if 4 people are on 7th place, slower time will be on 11th place etc |
|
|
stuff
|
06.10.2008 18:43:42 | |
|
Joined: 25. 09. 2008 Posts: 3 |
..and 22, 24, 39, 47, 51 etc... ;) | |
|
stuff
|
06.10.2008 18:38:44 | |
|
Joined: 25. 09. 2008 Posts: 3 |
1. DeX 18.280 2. [fps]-G- 18.384 3. nLxajA 18.496 4. [gt]glm 18.648 5. -Gips- 18.664 6. p900*proton 18.720 7. >>kiccel<< 18.776 8. p900*crusher 18.800 9. Fuseeskaya 18.808 10. DbIPO4KA 18.872 11. nL-Fuck3r 18.904 12. undp|o 18.936 13. Dyxxx 18.944 13. SenT!neL 18.944 15. yotoon! 18.976 where 14 place?) W65B61S is #100, yotoon! - 14 |
|
|
eL-C7M
|
06.10.2008 14:35:00 | |
|
Joined: 22. 10. 2007 Posts: 19
|
nice |
|
Nt. Rock
|
06.10.2008 07:11:04 | |
Joined: 30. 10. 2005 Posts: 371 
|
perhaps.... | |
|
[khtti]
|
06.10.2008 00:39:29 | |
Joined: 06. 02. 2007 Posts: 62
|
i just posted in the wrong topic! |
|
|
[khtti]
|
06.10.2008 00:38:58 | |
|
Joined: 06. 02. 2007 Posts: 62
|
VERY NICE in cpm VERY TEDIOUS in vq3  but still 100% better than i expected |
|
